Two years late the FDA announces what real experts knew in 2021-2022.
In a rush for profits, BIG PHARMA influenced the FDA and exposed the children, parents, teachers, and others who were encouraged to vaccinate those who were at minimal risk from serious COVID-19 infection. Some school districts went as far as prohibiting the children from returning to school.
The Food and Drug Administration which is charged with protecting public safety and monitoring drug manufacturing receives a big fat X from this physician. Here is a regulatory body so quick to bypass its time frame and issue an emergency use authorization (EUA), failed to issue an emergency termination of approval for a vaccination. Could it be the EUA for vaccination improves profits for PHARMA, and rescinding the order would negatively affect PHARMA’s bottom line?
What the FDA officially published was:
Vaccinated children aged 12 to 17 face a heightened risk of myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation, and a related condition called pericarditis, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) researchers found.
The number of myocarditis and pericarditis events in that age group met the threshold for a safety signal, the researchers reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association on May 22, 2023.
The elevated risk was present within seven days of vaccination, according to the data.
Researchers identified 89 cases among 12- to 15-year-olds and 64 cases among 16- and 17-year-olds after reviewing records from commercial databases run by CVS Health, HealthCore, and Optum.
The claims were made between Dec. 11, 2020, when Pfizer’s vaccine was cleared by the FDA, and mid-2022.
Researchers looked at data to determine whether any of the 20 health problems were experienced at higher rates by the vaccinated. The problems included myocarditis or pericarditis, Bell’s palsy, appendicitis, and stroke.
Only myocarditis or pericarditis met the criteria for a safety signal, which may be related to vaccination.
Read further here for the full text from the Epoch Times
In their protocol (pdf) for conducting the research, FDA officials said they chose risk windows based on pre-pandemic studies, including one from 2007.
This FDA announcement vindicates physician scientists Robert Malone MD, Peter McCullough MD, and many others who were maligned for their “deviant’ science.